<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for istartedsomething</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:06:21 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on UX Taskforce: they&#8217;re listening by soma_furniture</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20080612/ux-taskforce-theyre-listening/comment-page-2/#comment-113920</link>
		<dc:creator>soma_furniture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=2987#comment-113920</guid>
		<description>Hello!
http://www2.iuav.it/moodle/user/view.php?id=3770 ,soma furniture,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
<a href="http://www2.iuav.it/moodle/user/view.php?id=3770" rel="nofollow">http://www2.iuav.it/moodle/user/view.php?id=3770</a> ,soma furniture,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UX Taskforce: they&#8217;re listening by xanax</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20080612/ux-taskforce-theyre-listening/comment-page-2/#comment-113919</link>
		<dc:creator>xanax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=2987#comment-113919</guid>
		<description>Hello!
http://www2.iuav.it/moodle/user/view.php?id=3768 ,order xanax on line,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
<a href="http://www2.iuav.it/moodle/user/view.php?id=3768" rel="nofollow">http://www2.iuav.it/moodle/user/view.php?id=3768</a> ,order xanax on line,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Explorer 9, a free upgrade for the web by Long Zheng</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20091119/internet-explorer-9-a-free-upgrade-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-113910</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Zheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3953#comment-113910</guid>
		<description>@ghjgjh: In all seriousness, anyone who is still  using XP by 2010 is missing out. However, Internet Explorer 9 will continue to work on XP since DirectX has software-mode fallbacks that I believe works on systems without a GPU or systems without the proper DirectX support.

@Gerry: The fact is, they already have this really complicated rendering system in place, they can spend all the time on standards and what not until they ship. I think that&#039;s what makes IE9 so interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ghjgjh: In all seriousness, anyone who is still  using XP by 2010 is missing out. However, Internet Explorer 9 will continue to work on XP since DirectX has software-mode fallbacks that I believe works on systems without a GPU or systems without the proper DirectX support.</p>
<p>@Gerry: The fact is, they already have this really complicated rendering system in place, they can spend all the time on standards and what not until they ship. I think that&#8217;s what makes IE9 so interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Explorer 9, a free upgrade for the web by mark</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20091119/internet-explorer-9-a-free-upgrade-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-113905</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3953#comment-113905</guid>
		<description>Very cool, I would love to see better browsers, and an improved IE would drive innovation. I&#039;d like to see a &quot;No-Scripts&quot; feature built in since Java Script is basically busted. They also need to integrate well with HTML 5 to be competitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool, I would love to see better browsers, and an improved IE would drive innovation. I&#8217;d like to see a &#8220;No-Scripts&#8221; feature built in since Java Script is basically busted. They also need to integrate well with HTML 5 to be competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft shows off prototype next-generation office wall by Xerox PARC, Apple, and Dead Newspapers &#171; Opinionated</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090927/microsoft-shows-off-prototype-next-generation-office-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-113904</link>
		<dc:creator>Xerox PARC, Apple, and Dead Newspapers &#171; Opinionated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3882#comment-113904</guid>
		<description>[...] Pre, Blackberry, Android), and we’re starting to see the promise of blackboards with Surface and wall-mounted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pre, Blackberry, Android), and we’re starting to see the promise of blackboards with Surface and wall-mounted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Explorer 9, a free upgrade for the web by Gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20091119/internet-explorer-9-a-free-upgrade-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-113886</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3953#comment-113886</guid>
		<description>Although having a GPU-powered rendering engine is interesting, I like to see more CSS3, HTML5, Canvas, SVG and DOM support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although having a GPU-powered rendering engine is interesting, I like to see more CSS3, HTML5, Canvas, SVG and DOM support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Explorer 9, a free upgrade for the web by ghjgjh</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20091119/internet-explorer-9-a-free-upgrade-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-113885</link>
		<dc:creator>ghjgjh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3953#comment-113885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Long, does your idea of “the web” exclude Windows XP users? (70%+) Because MS has not ported WDDM/DirectWrite/Direct2D to Windows XP? IE9 is *DEFINITELY* coming for XP but that version will continue to probably use GDI. That’s MS’s way ot making us upgrade. And now Windows 7 fanboy comments will follow with “What? You’re still on XP?”. But the 70% of the world’s users still are&quot;

I wouldn&#039;t worry about it, them noob idiots at MS fuck up all the time.  This will be no different, GPU acceleration will be used to hide the sloppy flaws and poor sub standards support, while highlighting to idiots that its faster in a few circumstances, but it won&#039;t really be overall nor will it really matter when you take away all that it can&#039;t do properly. What will still remain is a pile of shit engine with a standards deficiency(thus still dividing web developers time), it will still use a pile of shit looking GUI (as standard with all noob crap coming out of MS since visteergh), it will still have a serious lack of decent enhanced usability and power extensions with a lack of developer interest, combined with piss poor user customization and shit privacy and security control given to the user. It will be still be broken, if not more so while you wait for the next blue moon update to fix all the sloppy shit.. Most have realized this is the MS game, and most are waking up to this cheap shit trick. 

And what most people aren&#039;t realizing is that just how shit this GPU acceleration could be compared to already well established GDI support(I&#039;m not saying things don&#039;t need to move onto the GPU they do, but not the MS way), I always have multiple tabs often 60+ , you only have to look at the dumb shit architecture d way MS built in the multiple iexplorer.exe processes for each new tab and the delays and retardedness of that approach, doesn&#039;t even compare to the better Google chrome approach, although Chrome is very much shit compared Firefox. But GPU accererated browsing will be aimed at the noob, much how IE7/8 was designed and aimed at the noob who barely knows what a TAB is, let alone has more than 3 of them open at once. 

Just look at these, to see how the wonderful MS shity areo GPU desktop approach turns out in real world performance...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToFgYylqP_U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay-gqx18UTM

utter shit all round, including that crap Explorer shell. MS are slowly dying, and tbh I couldn&#039;t give a shit, they&#039;ve done this to themselves starting with that Vista fuck up, and they&#039;ve continued along the same path. Delivering shit for noobs, soon that is all they&#039;ll have left while everyone else goes to improve other platforms. XP is there last decent OS, everything else has been fuck up. Noobs alone won&#039;t keep you afloat MS, although you&#039;ve definitely amassed a lot of themtards. 

btw what is the uptake of Silverlight, I always thought I might try it out by v3, but MS are hopeless, Flash still reigns king on the web. Just saying.

&quot;Long,
Are You planning on something like “IE9 Taskforce” maybe?&quot;

What is the point, them retards at MS barely understand most requests.. Just laugh at Larry http://www.windows7taskforce.com/view/2776 - such stupidity at MS. And what a pile of shit Explorer shell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Long, does your idea of “the web” exclude Windows XP users? (70%+) Because MS has not ported WDDM/DirectWrite/Direct2D to Windows XP? IE9 is *DEFINITELY* coming for XP but that version will continue to probably use GDI. That’s MS’s way ot making us upgrade. And now Windows 7 fanboy comments will follow with “What? You’re still on XP?”. But the 70% of the world’s users still are&#8221;</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry about it, them noob idiots at MS fuck up all the time.  This will be no different, GPU acceleration will be used to hide the sloppy flaws and poor sub standards support, while highlighting to idiots that its faster in a few circumstances, but it won&#8217;t really be overall nor will it really matter when you take away all that it can&#8217;t do properly. What will still remain is a pile of shit engine with a standards deficiency(thus still dividing web developers time), it will still use a pile of shit looking GUI (as standard with all noob crap coming out of MS since visteergh), it will still have a serious lack of decent enhanced usability and power extensions with a lack of developer interest, combined with piss poor user customization and shit privacy and security control given to the user. It will be still be broken, if not more so while you wait for the next blue moon update to fix all the sloppy shit.. Most have realized this is the MS game, and most are waking up to this cheap shit trick. </p>
<p>And what most people aren&#8217;t realizing is that just how shit this GPU acceleration could be compared to already well established GDI support(I&#8217;m not saying things don&#8217;t need to move onto the GPU they do, but not the MS way), I always have multiple tabs often 60+ , you only have to look at the dumb shit architecture d way MS built in the multiple iexplorer.exe processes for each new tab and the delays and retardedness of that approach, doesn&#8217;t even compare to the better Google chrome approach, although Chrome is very much shit compared Firefox. But GPU accererated browsing will be aimed at the noob, much how IE7/8 was designed and aimed at the noob who barely knows what a TAB is, let alone has more than 3 of them open at once. </p>
<p>Just look at these, to see how the wonderful MS shity areo GPU desktop approach turns out in real world performance&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToFgYylqP_U" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToFgYylqP_U</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay-gqx18UTM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay-gqx18UTM</a></p>
<p>utter shit all round, including that crap Explorer shell. MS are slowly dying, and tbh I couldn&#8217;t give a shit, they&#8217;ve done this to themselves starting with that Vista fuck up, and they&#8217;ve continued along the same path. Delivering shit for noobs, soon that is all they&#8217;ll have left while everyone else goes to improve other platforms. XP is there last decent OS, everything else has been fuck up. Noobs alone won&#8217;t keep you afloat MS, although you&#8217;ve definitely amassed a lot of themtards. </p>
<p>btw what is the uptake of Silverlight, I always thought I might try it out by v3, but MS are hopeless, Flash still reigns king on the web. Just saying.</p>
<p>&#8220;Long,<br />
Are You planning on something like “IE9 Taskforce” maybe?&#8221;</p>
<p>What is the point, them retards at MS barely understand most requests.. Just laugh at Larry <a href="http://www.windows7taskforce.com/view/2776" rel="nofollow">http://www.windows7taskforce.com/view/2776</a> &#8211; such stupidity at MS. And what a pile of shit Explorer shell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Explorer 9, a free upgrade for the web by AW</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20091119/internet-explorer-9-a-free-upgrade-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-113841</link>
		<dc:creator>AW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3953#comment-113841</guid>
		<description>WTF? As a follower of pragmatism, I&#039;m no fanboy, but seriously, just because IE9&#039;s gonna get hardware acceleration it will &quot;leapfrog&quot; the competition? That&#039;s like saying, &quot;Yo dawg, we got tabs, we da best.&quot; Firefox and Chrome are essentially moving at light-speed at this point; hell Firefox is /already/ using Cairo, which will use hardware acceleration when available.

I don&#039;t see this one feature making IE9 the break-out hit of the year or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF? As a follower of pragmatism, I&#8217;m no fanboy, but seriously, just because IE9&#8217;s gonna get hardware acceleration it will &#8220;leapfrog&#8221; the competition? That&#8217;s like saying, &#8220;Yo dawg, we got tabs, we da best.&#8221; Firefox and Chrome are essentially moving at light-speed at this point; hell Firefox is /already/ using Cairo, which will use hardware acceleration when available.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see this one feature making IE9 the break-out hit of the year or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Explorer 9, a free upgrade for the web by Can</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20091119/internet-explorer-9-a-free-upgrade-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-113785</link>
		<dc:creator>Can</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3953#comment-113785</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure the Firefox rendering engine is OpenGL accelerated (not related to WebGL) and it happened quite a while back &amp; there were some impressive performance gains from it. They defintely did something because I recall reading blog posts about it on Mozilla dev blogs and getting a multi-platform back-end to use OpenGL working for Windows/OSX/Linux.

Now whether Firefox actually makes use of OpenGL using the full power of a GPU is another matter, it probably doesn&#039;t but if Microsoft can get Direct2D GPU support and big performance gains all the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the Firefox rendering engine is OpenGL accelerated (not related to WebGL) and it happened quite a while back &amp; there were some impressive performance gains from it. They defintely did something because I recall reading blog posts about it on Mozilla dev blogs and getting a multi-platform back-end to use OpenGL working for Windows/OSX/Linux.</p>
<p>Now whether Firefox actually makes use of OpenGL using the full power of a GPU is another matter, it probably doesn&#8217;t but if Microsoft can get Direct2D GPU support and big performance gains all the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Royale Noir: secret XP theme uncovered (download) by clean slate &#124; ihumanable</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20061029/royale-noir/comment-page-10/#comment-113780</link>
		<dc:creator>clean slate &#124; ihumanable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20061029/royale-noir/#comment-113780</guid>
		<description>[...] Royale Noir XP Theme [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Royale Noir XP Theme [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
