<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s abandoned &#8220;Sputnik&#8221; wireless webcam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Sputnik concept boxshot makes me wish it was so much more &#124; Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-139807</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Sputnik concept boxshot makes me wish it was so much more &#124; Windows 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-139807</guid>
		<description>[...] Sometimes the deadpool contains a few unpolished gems too. Thanks to a tip from Stephen Chapman of MSFTKitchen, we now have a concept image of what might have been the packaging and boxart for the ill-fated Microsoft wireless webcam product cleverly branded Sputnik. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sometimes the deadpool contains a few unpolished gems too. Thanks to a tip from Stephen Chapman of MSFTKitchen, we now have a concept image of what might have been the packaging and boxart for the ill-fated Microsoft wireless webcam product cleverly branded Sputnik. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Sputnik concept boxshot makes me wish it was so much more &#8211; istartedsomething</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-139794</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Sputnik concept boxshot makes me wish it was so much more &#8211; istartedsomething</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-139794</guid>
		<description>[...] Sometimes the deadpool contains a few unpolished gems too. Thanks to a tip from Stephen Chapman of MSFTKitchen, we now have a concept image of what might have been the packaging and boxart for the ill-fated Microsoft wireless webcam product cleverly branded Sputnik. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sometimes the deadpool contains a few unpolished gems too. Thanks to a tip from Stephen Chapman of MSFTKitchen, we now have a concept image of what might have been the packaging and boxart for the ill-fated Microsoft wireless webcam product cleverly branded Sputnik. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGentry</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-121399</link>
		<dc:creator>DGentry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-121399</guid>
		<description>As others have mentioned, I think there are now smartphone apps which do roughly what the video shows. Qik and Kyte TV can livestream video from a smartphone, and are integrated with your social networks (the current equivalent to chatting via MSN).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have mentioned, I think there are now smartphone apps which do roughly what the video shows. Qik and Kyte TV can livestream video from a smartphone, and are integrated with your social networks (the current equivalent to chatting via MSN).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Sputnik Wireless Webcam Demonstrated &#8211; Video</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-121392</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Sputnik Wireless Webcam Demonstrated &#8211; Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-121392</guid>
		<description>[...] [Source]  Loading   google.load(&#039;search&#039;, &#039;1&#039;); google.setOnLoadCallback(function(){ new google.search.CustomSearchControl(&#039;012240321471511227919:cz4ngqat5fa&#039;).draw(&#039;cse&#039;); }, true); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Source]  Loading   google.load(&#39;search&#39;, &#39;1&#39;); google.setOnLoadCallback(function(){ new google.search.CustomSearchControl(&#39;012240321471511227919:cz4ngqat5fa&#39;) .draw(&#39;cse&#39;); }, true); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Bowen</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-121385</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-121385</guid>
		<description>There was a Logitech wireless webcam a few years ago... http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-961144-0403-Cordless-QuickCam-Camera/dp/B00006OM4L

With regards to a mobile application, I remember being very happy with Mobiola WebCam for my Nokia N95 a few years ago. It used the 5 MP camera on the phone and broadcast it to my PC over Bluetooth. The major problem with this of course, was range.

A modern application would use WiFi, I suppose. The simplicity of Bluetooth has its advantages though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a Logitech wireless webcam a few years ago&#8230; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-961144-0403-Cordless-QuickCam-Camera/dp/B00006OM4L" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-961144-0403-Cordless-QuickCam-Camera/dp &nbsp;/B00006OM4L</a></p>
<p>With regards to a mobile application, I remember being very happy with Mobiola WebCam for my Nokia N95 a few years ago. It used the 5 MP camera on the phone and broadcast it to my PC over Bluetooth. The major problem with this of course, was range.</p>
<p>A modern application would use WiFi, I suppose. The simplicity of Bluetooth has its advantages though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kdilkington</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-121371</link>
		<dc:creator>kdilkington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-121371</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so odd to see open beer in a promotional video (even if it&#039;s meant to be an internal one) for a consumer device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so odd to see open beer in a promotional video (even if it&#8217;s meant to be an internal one) for a consumer device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avatar X</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-121365</link>
		<dc:creator>Avatar X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-121365</guid>
		<description>I remember a wireless webcam did existed around 2006. don&#039;t remember the brand but i remember its range being only 10-15 meters and it costing a $100 bucks. Reason why they didn&#039;t did well. 

But since WM 5.0 there have been software to turn a WM device into a webcam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a wireless webcam did existed around 2006. don&#8217;t remember the brand but i remember its range being only 10-15 meters and it costing a $100 bucks. Reason why they didn&#8217;t did well. </p>
<p>But since WM 5.0 there have been software to turn a WM device into a webcam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ram</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-121364</link>
		<dc:creator>ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-121364</guid>
		<description>WP7 app is a great idea, with silverlight in the SDK its easier than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WP7 app is a great idea, with silverlight in the SDK its easier than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnCz</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-121363</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnCz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-121363</guid>
		<description>What is the difference between this and say, running a video chat application on your portable device via your wifi network?  Is it the transition from desktop mode to portable mode that you find interesting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between this and say, running a video chat application on your portable device via your wifi network?  Is it the transition from desktop mode to portable mode that you find interesting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8675309</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20100309/microsofts-abandoned-sputnik-wireless-webcam/#comment-121361</link>
		<dc:creator>8675309</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=4050#comment-121361</guid>
		<description>i could see that the price was a factor aswell. but now i could be unshelfed with cheaper/better components</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i could see that the price was a factor aswell. but now i could be unshelfed with cheaper/better components</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

