<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft dismisses Windows 7 UAC security flaw, continues to insist it is &#8220;by design&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does UAC kill the need to run as a regular user? - Admins Goodies</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-145299</link>
		<dc:creator>Does UAC kill the need to run as a regular user? - Admins Goodies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-145299</guid>
		<description>[...] Check this out: http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check this out: <a href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by.." rel="nofollow">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows- 7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-136261</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-136261</guid>
		<description>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STOP PAYING FOR WINDOWS SECURITY!!! &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-124215</link>
		<dc:creator>STOP PAYING FOR WINDOWS SECURITY!!! &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-124215</guid>
		<description>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microosft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough &#124; Shadowland</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-117492</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microosft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough &#124; Shadowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-117492</guid>
		<description>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The next generation Windows and Office: an open letter to Microsoft &#124; iGeneration &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-115942</link>
		<dc:creator>The next generation Windows and Office: an open letter to Microsoft &#124; iGeneration &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-115942</guid>
		<description>[...]  You don&#8217;t seem to be listening much to the average consumer anymore, but I&#8217;m giving this a go anyway. Your policy on having openness, transparency, blogs and feedback are all good and well, because you&#8217;ve clearly put effort into collecting information to make both Windows and Office better. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  You don&#8217;t seem to be listening much to the average consumer anymore, but I&#8217;m giving this a go anyway. Your policy on having openness, transparency, blogs and feedback are all good and well, because you&#8217;ve clearly put effort into collecting information to make both Windows and Office better. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-115551</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-115551</guid>
		<description>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough [Opinion] &#171; The BAT Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-112966</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough [Opinion] &#171; The BAT Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-112966</guid>
		<description>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough [Opinion] &#171; AccessTech News</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-112965</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough [Opinion] &#171; AccessTech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-112965</guid>
		<description>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microosft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough &#171; Shadowland</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-112790</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microosft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough &#171; Shadowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-112790</guid>
		<description>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough [Opinion] &#183; TechBlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090131/microsoft-dismisses-windows-7-uac-security-flaw-insists-by-design/#comment-112774</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Paying for Windows Security; Microsoft&#8217;s Security Tools Are Good Enough [Opinion] &#183; TechBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3409#comment-112774</guid>
		<description>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the matter is that unless you&#8217;ve pushed the UAC slider all the way to the top, it&#8217;s not meant to be a security feature. The original intent was to change the way Windows works so that you can more easily run software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

