<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Measuring up Windows 7&#8217;s new &#8220;super&#8221; taskbar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:19:03 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Computer Scatter</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-119875</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Scatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-119875</guid>
		<description>Seriously, what&#039;s up with the padding/spacing around the icons on the taskbar? I was annoyed with vista because they were so spread apart, in windows 7 it is insane how far they&#039;re spread...wasted space. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, what&#8217;s up with the padding/spacing around the icons on the taskbar? I was annoyed with vista because they were so spread apart, in windows 7 it is insane how far they&#8217;re spread&#8230;wasted space. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollie</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-117610</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-117610</guid>
		<description>I mean a &quot;Quick Launch&quot;-field...

Chose &quot;New Toolbar&quot;. 

Write &quot;%userprofile%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch&quot; (without the &quot;&quot;) in the field and click Select Folder. 

This will create a new Toolbar. Empty it, unclick Show Text and so on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean a &#8220;Quick Launch&#8221;-field&#8230;</p>
<p>Chose &#8220;New Toolbar&#8221;. </p>
<p>Write &#8220;%userprofile%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch&#8221; (without the &#8220;&#8221;) in the field and click Select Folder. </p>
<p>This will create a new Toolbar. Empty it, unclick Show Text and so on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollie</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-117609</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-117609</guid>
		<description>There´s many ways to create a taskbar the way you want it to be. One easy way to change the distance between the icons is to create an empty Quick Start-filed and then use the paddles (?). This will compress or depress the whole line of icons. Another benifit is that you can place a short cut to the Dust Bin in it so you don´t need to have it on the desktop. mBy creating more Quick Start-fields you can custumize the taskbar and pin things like Folders etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There´s many ways to create a taskbar the way you want it to be. One easy way to change the distance between the icons is to create an empty Quick Start-filed and then use the paddles (?). This will compress or depress the whole line of icons. Another benifit is that you can place a short cut to the Dust Bin in it so you don´t need to have it on the desktop. mBy creating more Quick Start-fields you can custumize the taskbar and pin things like Folders etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ynkot</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-116773</link>
		<dc:creator>ynkot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-116773</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with Windows 7 clock area in taskbar? If you set the interface to use small icons, there is enormous blank space between the sides of the clock (it&#039;s the same space it occupies in large mode, when the date is shown). I don&#039;t suppose the wasted space is so that you can touch the clock to no avail?

I think the Windows 7 superbar is very inefficient in terms of space. Sure, some of you got 1680×1050 laptops and 1920×1080 desktops, but what about 1024x600 netbook? 

Damn you Asus for not providing Vista drivers for my Eee PC as I&#039;m stuck between XP and 7, and I think after Vista I&#039;m going to skip the 7 version just for the superbar alone!

P.S. Black and white standard icons (volume, network, etc.) on the taskbar don&#039;t look very attractive either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with Windows 7 clock area in taskbar? If you set the interface to use small icons, there is enormous blank space between the sides of the clock (it&#8217;s the same space it occupies in large mode, when the date is shown). I don&#8217;t suppose the wasted space is so that you can touch the clock to no avail?</p>
<p>I think the Windows 7 superbar is very inefficient in terms of space. Sure, some of you got 1680×1050 laptops and 1920×1080 desktops, but what about 1024&#215;600 netbook? </p>
<p>Damn you Asus for not providing Vista drivers for my Eee PC as I&#8217;m stuck between XP and 7, and I think after Vista I&#8217;m going to skip the 7 version just for the superbar alone!</p>
<p>P.S. Black and white standard icons (volume, network, etc.) on the taskbar don&#8217;t look very attractive either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minimizar o Windows Live Messenger no Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-112081</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimizar o Windows Live Messenger no Windows 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-112081</guid>
		<description>[...] no Windows XP/Vista, agora limita-se a ficar minimizado na nova barra do Windows apelidada de SuperTaskBar. Nova SuperTaskBar no Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no Windows XP/Vista, agora limita-se a ficar minimizado na nova barra do Windows apelidada de SuperTaskBar. Nova SuperTaskBar no Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-111175</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-111175</guid>
		<description>I have always had my task bar vertical. With about 20 programs running. In visa in vertical mode, you get multiple columns so I can see everything I have open. Now, that all change - for the worse.

Really disappointed that this wasn&#039;t addressed before the launch. Vertical columns allows quick access, monitoring and glance friendly visibility.

I appreciate the underlying adjustments sometimes requires some functionality to change, but to me this looks like a quick finish to a feature that should have been more complete.

I&#039;ll subscribe to this thread in the hope of some future good news. 

I&#039;ll also be praying for the return of a dock-able, task bar that maximised windows can stop at - again for the purposes of an always visible area that doesn&#039;t sit on top of other things. 

I certainly welcome the improvements, but accept them with a half smile through the knowledge that they are often balanced with seemingly nonsensical and unnecessary shortcomings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always had my task bar vertical. With about 20 programs running. In visa in vertical mode, you get multiple columns so I can see everything I have open. Now, that all change &#8211; for the worse.</p>
<p>Really disappointed that this wasn&#8217;t addressed before the launch. Vertical columns allows quick access, monitoring and glance friendly visibility.</p>
<p>I appreciate the underlying adjustments sometimes requires some functionality to change, but to me this looks like a quick finish to a feature that should have been more complete.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll subscribe to this thread in the hope of some future good news. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also be praying for the return of a dock-able, task bar that maximised windows can stop at &#8211; again for the purposes of an always visible area that doesn&#8217;t sit on top of other things. </p>
<p>I certainly welcome the improvements, but accept them with a half smile through the knowledge that they are often balanced with seemingly nonsensical and unnecessary shortcomings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-110588</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-110588</guid>
		<description>I had thought about upgrading to Windows 7, but this article has completely put me off. Windows Vista - The resource hog? I found it actually opperates faster than XP (okay so I have Home Basic + AERO&#039; modifications) oh and to further my point the machine I have running Vista is a laptop...

Windows 7 looked oddly attractive to me when I downloaded a third party look-a-like theme for Vista but seen as all the functionalities that I love about the existing start bar appear to be gone, I don&#039;t need to bother upgrading seen as the only feature I like from Windows 7 I can get for free and already have.

If I wanted icons rather than a description and large icons for programs I&#039;d prefer to start learning how to use a Mac OS =] I used Windows because it was familiar, if I have to relearn Windows why not migrate to an opperating system that seems to remain relatively similar and more importantly fixes what is broken and doesn&#039;t make more things that need fixing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had thought about upgrading to Windows 7, but this article has completely put me off. Windows Vista &#8211; The resource hog? I found it actually opperates faster than XP (okay so I have Home Basic + AERO&#8217; modifications) oh and to further my point the machine I have running Vista is a laptop&#8230;</p>
<p>Windows 7 looked oddly attractive to me when I downloaded a third party look-a-like theme for Vista but seen as all the functionalities that I love about the existing start bar appear to be gone, I don&#8217;t need to bother upgrading seen as the only feature I like from Windows 7 I can get for free and already have.</p>
<p>If I wanted icons rather than a description and large icons for programs I&#8217;d prefer to start learning how to use a Mac OS =] I used Windows because it was familiar, if I have to relearn Windows why not migrate to an opperating system that seems to remain relatively similar and more importantly fixes what is broken and doesn&#8217;t make more things that need fixing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agoodfella</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-109392</link>
		<dc:creator>agoodfella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-109392</guid>
		<description>Question folks:

The above article states that the taskbar height in Vista as 30px.

However, in practice, I&#039;ve found it to be 32px (perhaps its because I have re-sized my screen from its native resolution to 1400x900?)

In any case, this is important for me as I always create my wallpapers to the available visible real estate (i.e. every pixel above the task bar, hence, my default canvas for wallpapers are 1400x868 --&gt; thus my calculation for a 32px Vista taskbar height).

At any rate, what is W7&#039;s exact taskbar height? 30px or 32px (if it is exactly the same as Vista in my experience).

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question folks:</p>
<p>The above article states that the taskbar height in Vista as 30px.</p>
<p>However, in practice, I&#8217;ve found it to be 32px (perhaps its because I have re-sized my screen from its native resolution to 1400&#215;900?)</p>
<p>In any case, this is important for me as I always create my wallpapers to the available visible real estate (i.e. every pixel above the task bar, hence, my default canvas for wallpapers are 1400&#215;868 &#8211;&gt; thus my calculation for a 32px Vista taskbar height).</p>
<p>At any rate, what is W7&#8217;s exact taskbar height? 30px or 32px (if it is exactly the same as Vista in my experience).</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparativa: Taskbar Windows 7 VS. Windows Vista &#171; Windows 7 - Blog no oficial</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-70406</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparativa: Taskbar Windows 7 VS. Windows Vista &#171; Windows 7 - Blog no oficial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-70406</guid>
		<description>[...] istartedsomething   Escrito en SuperBar, Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] istartedsomething   Escrito en SuperBar, Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hry3w</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090105/measuring-up-windows-7s-new-super-taskbar/#comment-68962</link>
		<dc:creator>hry3w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3359#comment-68962</guid>
		<description>i think the worst part of Windows 7 is the start menu, i want XP start menu back or the classic start menu!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the worst part of Windows 7 is the start menu, i want XP start menu back or the classic start menu!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
