<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WinHEC 2008 agenda confirms native VHD support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:42:05 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: All about Microsoft mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65731</link>
		<dc:creator>All about Microsoft mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65731</guid>
		<description>[...] Native virtual hard disk (VHD) support  (I don&#039;t believe all of these features are enabled in the pre-beta Windows 7 build. I&#039;ll ask Microsoft for clarification.) Microsoft officials said today that the M3 pre-beta will go to PDC attendees, attendees of the company&#039;s Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) in early November, and a select group of other external testers. This is considered an application-programming-interface (API) complete build. A first public beta of Windows 7, that will be feature-complete, is due &quot;early next year,&quot; company officials said. (My bet? That&#039;s a worst-case date and the public beta will still show up before Christmas this year.) Don&#039;t expect multiple betas: From what officials are hinting, it sounds like there will be one beta, one release candidate and then RTM. Microsoft still isn&#039;t changing official guidance on when Windows 7 will ship. The official date is three years from general availability of Vista, meaning early 2010. I still believe that&#039;s a worst-case date and we&#039;ll see Windows 7 by the second half of 2009. posted by Mary Jo Foley October 28, 2008 @ 10:02 am [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Native virtual hard disk (VHD) support  (I don&#8217;t believe all of these features are enabled in the pre-beta Windows 7 build. I&#8217;ll ask Microsoft for clarification.) Microsoft officials said today that the M3 pre-beta will go to PDC attendees, attendees of the company&#8217;s Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) in early November, and a select group of other external testers. This is considered an application-programming-interface (API) complete build. A first public beta of Windows 7, that will be feature-complete, is due &#8220;early next year,&#8221; company officials said. (My bet? That&#8217;s a worst-case date and the public beta will still show up before Christmas this year.) Don&#8217;t expect multiple betas: From what officials are hinting, it sounds like there will be one beta, one release candidate and then RTM. Microsoft still isn&#8217;t changing official guidance on when Windows 7 will ship. The official date is three years from general availability of Vista, meaning early 2010. I still believe that&#8217;s a worst-case date and we&#8217;ll see Windows 7 by the second half of 2009. posted by Mary Jo Foley October 28, 2008 @ 10:02 am [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Native VHD Support in Windows 7? &#171; Power Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65557</link>
		<dc:creator>Native VHD Support in Windows 7? &#171; Power Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65557</guid>
		<description>[...] Server 2008 R2 &#8212; Tags: VHD, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2 &#8212; Brian @ 8:38 pm   Long Zheng writes about Native VHD support in Windows 7. To me, it meant a rapid step-up in their virtualization strategy.  Today, if you want to try out a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Server 2008 R2 &#8212; Tags: VHD, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2 &#8212; Brian @ 8:38 pm   Long Zheng writes about Native VHD support in Windows 7. To me, it meant a rapid step-up in their virtualization strategy.  Today, if you want to try out a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Native VHD Support in Windows 7? &#171; Power Windows - Protecting Mission Critical Microsoft Servers</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65375</link>
		<dc:creator>Native VHD Support in Windows 7? &#171; Power Windows - Protecting Mission Critical Microsoft Servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65375</guid>
		<description>[...] under: Virtualization, Windows Server 2008 R2 &#124; Tags: VHD, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2 &#124;  Long Zheng writes about Native VHD support in Windows 7. To me, it meant a rapid step-up in their virtualization strategy.  Today, if you want to try out a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] under: Virtualization, Windows Server 2008 R2 | Tags: VHD, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2 |  Long Zheng writes about Native VHD support in Windows 7. To me, it meant a rapid step-up in their virtualization strategy.  Today, if you want to try out a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65158</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65158</guid>
		<description>Windows Server 2008 R2 is indeed the proposed name for Windows 7 Server</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Server 2008 R2 is indeed the proposed name for Windows 7 Server</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Zheng</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65094</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Zheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65094</guid>
		<description>@Andre Da Costa: What I meant was that Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7 is not bit for bit, although are &quot;strategically aligned&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andre Da Costa: What I meant was that Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7 is not bit for bit, although are &#8220;strategically aligned&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Da Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65093</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Da Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65093</guid>
		<description>someone, part of your wish has been granted so far, the official, final name for Windows 7 is....&#039;Windows 7&#039;:
http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/13/introducing-windows-7.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone, part of your wish has been granted so far, the official, final name for Windows 7 is&#8230;.&#8217;Windows 7&#8242;:<br />
<a href="http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/13/introducing-windows-7.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/13/intr oducing-windows-7.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someone</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65090</link>
		<dc:creator>someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65090</guid>
		<description>Heaven forbid the return of Ultimate Extras. Give us Windows 7 Home and Windows 7 Professional and cut out the marketing schemes....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heaven forbid the return of Ultimate Extras. Give us Windows 7 Home and Windows 7 Professional and cut out the marketing schemes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Da Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65089</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Da Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65089</guid>
		<description>I agree with Robert, I found it unusual you described Windows Server 2008 R2 as technically not Windows 7. Would that make Windows 2000 Server &#039;technically&#039; not NT 5.0 regardless 2000 Server and 2000 Professional are the same version? Unless you meant, they don&#039;t share some of the same attributes, one is meant for client/server computing, while the other is desktop operating system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Robert, I found it unusual you described Windows Server 2008 R2 as technically not Windows 7. Would that make Windows 2000 Server &#8216;technically&#8217; not NT 5.0 regardless 2000 Server and 2000 Professional are the same version? Unless you meant, they don&#8217;t share some of the same attributes, one is meant for client/server computing, while the other is desktop operating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McLaws</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65084</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McLaws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65084</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think this post was about Windows editions, but Ed Bott just wrote a great post on the subject, and why you don&#039;t want just one edition of Windows, even though you think you do.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=563
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=564

IMHO, if you call yourself a techie, and you&#039;re confused by the Vista editions, then you aren&#039;t a real techie. They really aren&#039;t that complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think this post was about Windows editions, but Ed Bott just wrote a great post on the subject, and why you don&#8217;t want just one edition of Windows, even though you think you do.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=563" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=563</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=564" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=564</a></p>
<p>IMHO, if you call yourself a techie, and you&#8217;re confused by the Vista editions, then you aren&#8217;t a real techie. They really aren&#8217;t that complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Win4Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20081013/winhec-2008-agenda-confirms-native-vhd-suppor/comment-page-1/#comment-65082</link>
		<dc:creator>Win4Ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/?p=3170#comment-65082</guid>
		<description>Ok, so first off I would like to see Windows 7 have only 1 edition, and ideally it should be priced the same as Vista Home Premium.  If we have to have more than one edition, make it just 3 - Home Premium, Business, and Ultimate.  Or just Home Premium and Ultimate.  Anyhow, the native VHD support would be GREAT!!!!  It should definately be in all the editions (or hopefully in the one only edition ;-).  And if they don&#039;t want to have this directly in Windows, then make it be a feature of Virtual PC 2010 (or whatever they call it) and let it be supported on all versions of Windows 7 (hey, and also let it be supported on Vista and maybe even XP ... hmm).  But considering that Hyper-V Server is a free download already, it seems like the logical next step would be to mold that into Windows v.Next :-D.

And here&#039;s one more idea ... if we are going to have multiple versions of Windows 7, then they should release Windows 7 Home Premium as a Vista Ultimate extra, or let you get Windows 7 Ultimate at a discount.  That might make all current Windows Vista Ultimate users real happy with their Ultimate Extras, right?  Though I though Ultimate was still worth it without the Extras because it is Business + Home ... Media Center + Business Networking.  And the Extras we have now are pretty good.  But if they do that, it would be amazing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so first off I would like to see Windows 7 have only 1 edition, and ideally it should be priced the same as Vista Home Premium.  If we have to have more than one edition, make it just 3 &#8211; Home Premium, Business, and Ultimate.  Or just Home Premium and Ultimate.  Anyhow, the native VHD support would be GREAT!!!!  It should definately be in all the editions (or hopefully in the one only edition <img src='http://www.istartedsomething.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  And if they don&#8217;t want to have this directly in Windows, then make it be a feature of Virtual PC 2010 (or whatever they call it) and let it be supported on all versions of Windows 7 (hey, and also let it be supported on Vista and maybe even XP &#8230; hmm).  But considering that Hyper-V Server is a free download already, it seems like the logical next step would be to mold that into Windows v.Next <img src='http://www.istartedsomething.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s one more idea &#8230; if we are going to have multiple versions of Windows 7, then they should release Windows 7 Home Premium as a Vista Ultimate extra, or let you get Windows 7 Ultimate at a discount.  That might make all current Windows Vista Ultimate users real happy with their Ultimate Extras, right?  Though I though Ultimate was still worth it without the Extras because it is Business + Home &#8230; Media Center + Business Networking.  And the Extras we have now are pretty good.  But if they do that, it would be amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
