<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple guide to test Vista SP1 RC1 on a separate partition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slipstreamen van Windows Vista SP1</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-53211</link>
		<dc:creator>Slipstreamen van Windows Vista SP1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-53211</guid>
		<description>[...] makers van vLite, wanneer bovenstaand reeds gesimplificeerd stappenplan je niet direct aanspreekt. Testen met een tweede installatie of Service Pack 1 iets voor je is, is natuurlijk ook altijd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] makers van vLite, wanneer bovenstaand reeds gesimplificeerd stappenplan je niet direct aanspreekt. Testen met een tweede installatie of Service Pack 1 iets voor je is, is natuurlijk ook altijd [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Hilios</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44468</link>
		<dc:creator>George Hilios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44468</guid>
		<description>&quot;can someone help me? I have downloaded the standalone sp1 rc blah blah, and it won’t run! it creates a temporary folder then deletes itself. that’s it. what’s the problem?

please help me!&quot;

Please uninstall Nokia PC Suite and try the installation again.  We are working on fixing this in the final release</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;can someone help me? I have downloaded the standalone sp1 rc blah blah, and it won’t run! it creates a temporary folder then deletes itself. that’s it. what’s the problem?</p>
<p>please help me!&#8221;</p>
<p>Please uninstall Nokia PC Suite and try the installation again.  We are working on fixing this in the final release</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44255</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44255</guid>
		<description>So, we can have Vista installed on the C drive and nothing on the new partition, and still install Vista SP1 on the new partition? Or, what do I need to do to be able to actually use the new partition [which I already created]?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, we can have Vista installed on the C drive and nothing on the new partition, and still install Vista SP1 on the new partition? Or, what do I need to do to be able to actually use the new partition [which I already created]?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kneen</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44185</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kneen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44185</guid>
		<description>Great post as always Long. I bit the bullet and upgraded my machine to SP1 due to some long suffering issues I&#039;ve posted previously on my blog. My initial attempt didn&#039;t go well (windows update issues) and so I reverted to a backup of my drive tried again with success. 

System does see snappier and readyboost actually seems to do something now although not sure I need it with 3gb.

One thing though, I never got an option to create a recovery disk and can&#039;t find where to do this in the &quot;maintenance&quot; folder.

Great blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post as always Long. I bit the bullet and upgraded my machine to SP1 due to some long suffering issues I&#8217;ve posted previously on my blog. My initial attempt didn&#8217;t go well (windows update issues) and so I reverted to a backup of my drive tried again with success. </p>
<p>System does see snappier and readyboost actually seems to do something now although not sure I need it with 3gb.</p>
<p>One thing though, I never got an option to create a recovery disk and can&#8217;t find where to do this in the &#8220;maintenance&#8221; folder.</p>
<p>Great blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNetAvenger</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44150</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNetAvenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44150</guid>
		<description>One thing a lot of people often overlook in testing Vista, is that you MUST let it run a few days before it starts optimizing itself based on user work patterns and applications.

The difference between a day 1 installation and Vista performance at the end of day 7 or day 10 can be a difference of 2-10x.

So if you intend on doing any benchmarking of a new installation or testing it for performance, be sure to be using it for several days or things like SuperFetch and other optimization tools will not be working, so you won&#039;t see benefits in terms of performance where Vista does its best work.

This also applies to a SP1 update, as the SP1 update specifically clears all optimizations from the RTM setup even if you have been running Vista on the machine for a year, it will need a few days to rebuild the optimizations after you install SP1 - see install notes.

This is also true of startup speed specifically, as I have seen many reviews test startup speed on a Vista installation the first day it is installed, yet MS specifically says that Vista doesn&#039;t even start to optimize the boot performance until after a few days (giving the user time to install other software and drivers) before Vista digs in and boosts startup times. 

For example on the system I am currently typing on, Fresh Install, SP1 Installed, Boot Time Day 1 - 90secs. Tons of applicaitons loaded and equipment hooked up - Boot Time Day 7 - 15secs. 

Quite a dramatic difference, especially considering the additional overhead of several drivers and startup programs. The same goes for launching a game I play, Day 1 Launch time 30secs, FPS 40-50. Day 7 Launch Time 10secs, FPS 60-70. (The extra FPS comes from both the data being cached optimally and a few optimizations in terms of what textures it shifts in and out of System RAM, as I run on the highest quality settings.) Next time you see a game review where Vista and XP are not running neck and neck, you can be sure the reviewer did not allow any optimization time on the Vista system.

The day 1 Vista performance difference is also a reason you find a lot of users install Vista, then uninstall it because it seems slow or slower; however, if they ran Vista a few days it would fell significantly faster, and faster than XP.

Just a few thoughts to keep in mind while testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing a lot of people often overlook in testing Vista, is that you MUST let it run a few days before it starts optimizing itself based on user work patterns and applications.</p>
<p>The difference between a day 1 installation and Vista performance at the end of day 7 or day 10 can be a difference of 2-10x.</p>
<p>So if you intend on doing any benchmarking of a new installation or testing it for performance, be sure to be using it for several days or things like SuperFetch and other optimization tools will not be working, so you won&#8217;t see benefits in terms of performance where Vista does its best work.</p>
<p>This also applies to a SP1 update, as the SP1 update specifically clears all optimizations from the RTM setup even if you have been running Vista on the machine for a year, it will need a few days to rebuild the optimizations after you install SP1 &#8211; see install notes.</p>
<p>This is also true of startup speed specifically, as I have seen many reviews test startup speed on a Vista installation the first day it is installed, yet MS specifically says that Vista doesn&#8217;t even start to optimize the boot performance until after a few days (giving the user time to install other software and drivers) before Vista digs in and boosts startup times. </p>
<p>For example on the system I am currently typing on, Fresh Install, SP1 Installed, Boot Time Day 1 &#8211; 90secs. Tons of applicaitons loaded and equipment hooked up &#8211; Boot Time Day 7 &#8211; 15secs. </p>
<p>Quite a dramatic difference, especially considering the additional overhead of several drivers and startup programs. The same goes for launching a game I play, Day 1 Launch time 30secs, FPS 40-50. Day 7 Launch Time 10secs, FPS 60-70. (The extra FPS comes from both the data being cached optimally and a few optimizations in terms of what textures it shifts in and out of System RAM, as I run on the highest quality settings.) Next time you see a game review where Vista and XP are not running neck and neck, you can be sure the reviewer did not allow any optimization time on the Vista system.</p>
<p>The day 1 Vista performance difference is also a reason you find a lot of users install Vista, then uninstall it because it seems slow or slower; however, if they ran Vista a few days it would fell significantly faster, and faster than XP.</p>
<p>Just a few thoughts to keep in mind while testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texcymbal.Com &#187; Simple guide to test Vista SP1 RC1 on a separate partition</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44086</link>
		<dc:creator>Texcymbal.Com &#187; Simple guide to test Vista SP1 RC1 on a separate partition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44086</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting post today on Simple guide to test Vista SP1 RC1 on a separate partitionHere&#8217;s a quick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting post today on Simple guide to test Vista SP1 RC1 on a separate partitionHere&#8217;s a quick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Zheng</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44078</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Zheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44078</guid>
		<description>@anonymous: As far as I know, none of the third-party softwares can do what Vista can do without a restart, which is why I highly recommend this method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@anonymous: As far as I know, none of the third-party softwares can do what Vista can do without a restart, which is why I highly recommend this method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITsVISTA Web Links: December 10th, 2007 &#124; ITsVISTA</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44069</link>
		<dc:creator>ITsVISTA Web Links: December 10th, 2007 &#124; ITsVISTA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44069</guid>
		<description>[...] Simple guide to test Vista SP1 RC1 on a separate partition Long Zheng describes a nice way to test SP1 without affecting your current install. (tags: SP1 Partition ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simple guide to test Vista SP1 RC1 on a separate partition Long Zheng describes a nice way to test SP1 without affecting your current install. (tags: SP1 Partition ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surilamin</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44052</link>
		<dc:creator>surilamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44052</guid>
		<description>&quot;media drive (D:) where I keep all my 100% legitamate media downloads&quot; roflcopter :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;media drive (D:) where I keep all my 100% legitamate media downloads&#8221; roflcopter <img src='http://www.istartedsomething.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wojtekmaj</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44051</link>
		<dc:creator>wojtekmaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071211/guide-test-vista-sp1-rc1-partition/#comment-44051</guid>
		<description>really nice guide! thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really nice guide! thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

