<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft patent reveals some sort of Windows-based multimedia/communication device (crappy pics included)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:19:17 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zune Accessory &#187; Microsoft patent reveals some sort of Windows-based multimedia/communication device (crappy pics included)</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31574</link>
		<dc:creator>Zune Accessory &#187; Microsoft patent reveals some sort of Windows-based multimedia/communication device (crappy pics included)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31574</guid>
		<description>[...] post by istartedsomething   June 18th 2007 Posted to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by istartedsomething   June 18th 2007 Posted to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nexus</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31504</link>
		<dc:creator>Nexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31504</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll add my input. I think most people are thinking all wrong about this. a UMPC is a full blown windows computer, I have the feeling that this is a slightly smaller scope device. Think Intel&#039;s MID UMPC&#039;s blended somewhat with a Creative Zen Vision:W. In my mind this would be the flagship zune product, much the same way the W is to creative, but it encomasses a lot of third party support by using windows mobile underneath (and not something as &#039;heavy&#039; as a full blown os). Also remember the old &#039;Haiku&#039; UMPC Gates showed off at (surprisingly enough WinHEC &#039;05, same year these were filled) Microsoft may have realised that the bulky full blown UMPC&#039;s wont reach the Haiku thin and light factor for many years, but they could hit that vision with Windows Mobile. You may be used to thinking of windows mobile as a dummy PDA OS but i think its capable of the concept&#039;s images of the patent filing by simply giving it a speedier processor and plenty of ram and it could shine.

In my mind this device would fill the media player need (vision:W/Zune/iPod) and fill the needs of a lightweight device that could do internet/email/office (folio/MID). Instant on, WM API&#039;s etc. This would also be the evolution of the portable media center microsoft killed off. The Zune UI is basically that of media center&#039;s and I can imagine this being strickly Microsoft with no OEM&#039;s making them so microsoft gets it done right. It would fall under the Zune brand.

It actually makes a lot of sense to include a e-ink d-pad, because if done well icons can be a single black color and you have a quick and direct choice for what your options are when you drill into a certain situation (like someone messaging you) this could also have touchscreen ontop of it for answering IM&#039;s or an attachable keyboard like the new HTC WM device). However that d-pad would still be your &#039;home&#039; of sorts. It would be a great place for alerts and notifications that need the immediate-ness of quick input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll add my input. I think most people are thinking all wrong about this. a UMPC is a full blown windows computer, I have the feeling that this is a slightly smaller scope device. Think Intel&#8217;s MID UMPC&#8217;s blended somewhat with a Creative Zen Vision:W. In my mind this would be the flagship zune product, much the same way the W is to creative, but it encomasses a lot of third party support by using windows mobile underneath (and not something as &#8216;heavy&#8217; as a full blown os). Also remember the old &#8216;Haiku&#8217; UMPC Gates showed off at (surprisingly enough WinHEC &#8216;05, same year these were filled) Microsoft may have realised that the bulky full blown UMPC&#8217;s wont reach the Haiku thin and light factor for many years, but they could hit that vision with Windows Mobile. You may be used to thinking of windows mobile as a dummy PDA OS but i think its capable of the concept&#8217;s images of the patent filing by simply giving it a speedier processor and plenty of ram and it could shine.</p>
<p>In my mind this device would fill the media player need (vision:W/Zune/iPod) and fill the needs of a lightweight device that could do internet/email/office (folio/MID). Instant on, WM API&#8217;s etc. This would also be the evolution of the portable media center microsoft killed off. The Zune UI is basically that of media center&#8217;s and I can imagine this being strickly Microsoft with no OEM&#8217;s making them so microsoft gets it done right. It would fall under the Zune brand.</p>
<p>It actually makes a lot of sense to include a e-ink d-pad, because if done well icons can be a single black color and you have a quick and direct choice for what your options are when you drill into a certain situation (like someone messaging you) this could also have touchscreen ontop of it for answering IM&#8217;s or an attachable keyboard like the new HTC WM device). However that d-pad would still be your &#8216;home&#8217; of sorts. It would be a great place for alerts and notifications that need the immediate-ness of quick input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoInTheMix</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31503</link>
		<dc:creator>BoInTheMix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31503</guid>
		<description>ohh wow! i like it :) very nice alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohh wow! i like it <img src='http://www.istartedsomething.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  very nice alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31434</guid>
		<description>Why not just make it all touchscreen? Much more easier than having changing button icons. Changing button icons is cool, but it&#039;s not really needed that much, or wanted. It&#039;s cool, but it&#039;s ok without it. I&#039;d rather have it be a complete touchscreen than changing button controls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just make it all touchscreen? Much more easier than having changing button icons. Changing button icons is cool, but it&#8217;s not really needed that much, or wanted. It&#8217;s cool, but it&#8217;s ok without it. I&#8217;d rather have it be a complete touchscreen than changing button controls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31424</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31424</guid>
		<description>Nice job on the image Alex!
Long, nice post. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job on the image Alex!<br />
Long, nice post. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Zheng</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31421</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Zheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31421</guid>
		<description>@Alex: Oh wow that&#039;s hot! Wish I had some time to work on something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alex: Oh wow that&#8217;s hot! Wish I had some time to work on something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31420</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31420</guid>
		<description>Took the liberty to color the image a bit, http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/7639/mmcvl8.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took the liberty to color the image a bit, <a href="http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/7639/mmcvl8.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/7639/mmcvl8.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Zheng</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31419</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Zheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31419</guid>
		<description>True, it is very similar to the Origami, but I don&#039;t think any UMPCs have context-aware buttons or a Media Center styled interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, it is very similar to the Origami, but I don&#8217;t think any UMPCs have context-aware buttons or a Media Center styled interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: origami</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31417</link>
		<dc:creator>origami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31417</guid>
		<description>This IS origami experience:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/umpc/default.mspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This IS origami experience:<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/umpc/default.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/umpc/default.mspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31414</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070618/microsoft-patent-windows-multimedia-communication-device/#comment-31414</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ts a nice concept in my opinion, i would love to see some of that technology in future products. Touch screens in all its glory, the electronic ink D-Pad attracts me more for some reason, especially considering that future products might make use of both technologies. A Zune that looks like that definetively is far more attractive than the current one, which i honestly think is just an embarrassment to Microsoft...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ts a nice concept in my opinion, i would love to see some of that technology in future products. Touch screens in all its glory, the electronic ink D-Pad attracts me more for some reason, especially considering that future products might make use of both technologies. A Zune that looks like that definetively is far more attractive than the current one, which i honestly think is just an embarrassment to Microsoft&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
