<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD&#8217;s executive VP Henri Richard talks about Vista drivers, pricing &amp; Fusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:05:34 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EyeAm</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/comment-page-1/#comment-29490</link>
		<dc:creator>EyeAm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/#comment-29490</guid>
		<description>I wonder what this means for the (now AMD-owned) ATI Catalyst drivers. Under Windows XP, my ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT video graphics card allowed my monitor to be pushed to its maximum resolution of 2048 x 1536, but now I&#039;m stuck at 1600 x 1200 resolution (for the same card and monitor) under Vista (64-Bit). Additionally, the Catalyst center performs even less under Vista, with less features. There is currently NO TV/Capture features with any ATI video graphics cards under Vista (certainly not 64-Bit)--according to their own website. It&#039;s like buying a brand that does nothing, or doesn&#039;t do as advertised. If they don&#039;t fix this, they&#039;ll lose big time in this business. A card that has a built-in tuner such as the X800, and it can&#039;t even get cable TV going under Vista? C&#039;mon. It&#039;s this kind of thing that will cause me to look at another video graphics card provider/company!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what this means for the (now AMD-owned) ATI Catalyst drivers. Under Windows XP, my ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT video graphics card allowed my monitor to be pushed to its maximum resolution of 2048 x 1536, but now I&#8217;m stuck at 1600 x 1200 resolution (for the same card and monitor) under Vista (64-Bit). Additionally, the Catalyst center performs even less under Vista, with less features. There is currently NO TV/Capture features with any ATI video graphics cards under Vista (certainly not 64-Bit)&#8211;according to their own website. It&#8217;s like buying a brand that does nothing, or doesn&#8217;t do as advertised. If they don&#8217;t fix this, they&#8217;ll lose big time in this business. A card that has a built-in tuner such as the X800, and it can&#8217;t even get cable TV going under Vista? C&#8217;mon. It&#8217;s this kind of thing that will cause me to look at another video graphics card provider/company!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RC</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/comment-page-1/#comment-29202</link>
		<dc:creator>RC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 06:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/#comment-29202</guid>
		<description>Did anyone ask why ATI (AMD) chose not to provide tuner drivers for some of their graphics cards?  AMD seriously let me down, as a customer, over this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone ask why ATI (AMD) chose not to provide tuner drivers for some of their graphics cards?  AMD seriously let me down, as a customer, over this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrmckeb</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/comment-page-1/#comment-29166</link>
		<dc:creator>mrmckeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/#comment-29166</guid>
		<description>I love the look on his face when he thinks to himself (Q2) &quot;Long? Where have I heard that name before?&quot;
And yes... I agree with you Marco. Two or three driver releases and XP will look like dog pooh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the look on his face when he thinks to himself (Q2) &#8220;Long? Where have I heard that name before?&#8221;<br />
And yes&#8230; I agree with you Marco. Two or three driver releases and XP will look like dog pooh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise Linux Log &#187; AMD will deliver open graphics drivers</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/comment-page-1/#comment-29148</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise Linux Log &#187; AMD will deliver open graphics drivers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/#comment-29148</guid>
		<description>[...] in a webcast last week Richard told the world that AMD would be delivering Vista drivers, too, and supporting it with gusto. According to the blog, istartedsomething.com: &#8220;First [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a webcast last week Richard told the world that AMD would be delivering Vista drivers, too, and supporting it with gusto. According to the blog, istartedsomething.com: &#8220;First [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/comment-page-1/#comment-29139</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070509/amd-100-vista-days-webcast/#comment-29139</guid>
		<description>vista drivers will have soon performance of xp drivers. well im not so sure about that statement. i wonder if the todays graphiccards (especially those in the notebooks) can even have the same performance as they have in xp. i think there will always be a discrepancy.
i guess this problem will be solved with newer generations of graphiccards, not the current ones.

what u guys think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vista drivers will have soon performance of xp drivers. well im not so sure about that statement. i wonder if the todays graphiccards (especially those in the notebooks) can even have the same performance as they have in xp. i think there will always be a discrepancy.<br />
i guess this problem will be solved with newer generations of graphiccards, not the current ones.</p>
<p>what u guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
