<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReadyBoost works, but not a miracle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/</link>
	<description>All the stuff about Microsoft and technology you haven&#039;t read anywhere else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:08:54 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Readyboost Monitor &#124; SEXY PRODUCT REVIEWS</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-69600</link>
		<dc:creator>Readyboost Monitor &#124; SEXY PRODUCT REVIEWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-69600</guid>
		<description>[...] should be obvious that they do not come near the performance of computer memory modules. In fact, tests have shown that Readyboost has barely any impact on performance. What it does have an impact on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should be obvious that they do not come near the performance of computer memory modules. In fact, tests have shown that Readyboost has barely any impact on performance. What it does have an impact on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista SP1 will fix critical ReadyBoost performance bug - istartedsomething</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-33042</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista SP1 will fix critical ReadyBoost performance bug - istartedsomething</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-33042</guid>
		<description>[...] a day prior, a Microsoft employee silently outlined a critical flaw in Windows Vista&#8217;s ReadyBoost feature and mentioned SP1 would include the fix - the first time anyone at Microsoft has stated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a day prior, a Microsoft employee silently outlined a critical flaw in Windows Vista&#8217;s ReadyBoost feature and mentioned SP1 would include the fix &#8211; the first time anyone at Microsoft has stated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Oppenheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-30632</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Oppenheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-30632</guid>
		<description>Well, what is great is that contrary to popular belief you are able to use multiple ready boost drives- 2 8 gig flash drives, with my core 2 quad x2  8 gigs of ddr3,  raids 2, vista 64 etc etc, I was able to get some needed responsiveness running xp pro in a virtual enviroment, my system has never run faster, ty for the article,

Kay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what is great is that contrary to popular belief you are able to use multiple ready boost drives- 2 8 gig flash drives, with my core 2 quad x2  8 gigs of ddr3,  raids 2, vista 64 etc etc, I was able to get some needed responsiveness running xp pro in a virtual enviroment, my system has never run faster, ty for the article,</p>
<p>Kay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReadyBoost有点用，但并非那么神奇 &#124; 潜云思绪</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-29586</link>
		<dc:creator>ReadyBoost有点用，但并非那么神奇 &#124; 潜云思绪</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-29586</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 原文:ReadyBoost works, but not a miracle   (还没人打分呢，来一个？) &nbsp;ϽϢ &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toshiba M400 now with upgrades at PR&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-27855</link>
		<dc:creator>Toshiba M400 now with upgrades at PR&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-27855</guid>
		<description>[...] as I had read several reviews that it could improve performance and more importantly it did work with the M400s SD Card reader. I managed to get one off of eBay for the princely sum of £11 and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as I had read several reviews that it could improve performance and more importantly it did work with the M400s SD Card reader. I managed to get one off of eBay for the princely sum of £11 and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Conder</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-25164</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Conder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-25164</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trying to determine if even a relatively small memory card (512MB old, slow memory stick duo) can help system performance on a Sony UX390N (1GB RAM, 32GB SSD disk -- all flash already).  

My test app was Windows Live Writer.  Without the memory stick in, it loaded in about 9 seconds the first time and then 7 seconds after that.  However, with the memory stick in, it still loaded at about 9 seconds the first time, but then would start to load in about 5 seconds.

This is completely non-scientific but it shows that it can help out even if the main hard disk is already rather fast -- in this case, it&#039;s fully solid state so it&#039;s a similar form.  I&#039;m guessing that the responsiveness boost here comes from the fact that Vista can read from both at once without saturating the higher levels of bus bandwidth.  

It sits flush in the machine, so there is no reason for me to not have it in (unless I find it hurts the battery life by continually moving the cache around -- it used 50% processor for over a minute to load up the cache right after insert).  A faster one might do even more good, too.  It seems to only write at about 2-3MB/sec and doesn&#039;t appear to read much faster than that.

Just some more data -- &quot;jeff&quot; above had asked about Memory Sticks and this confirms they help just like everything else.

-Shane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to determine if even a relatively small memory card (512MB old, slow memory stick duo) can help system performance on a Sony UX390N (1GB RAM, 32GB SSD disk &#8212; all flash already).  </p>
<p>My test app was Windows Live Writer.  Without the memory stick in, it loaded in about 9 seconds the first time and then 7 seconds after that.  However, with the memory stick in, it still loaded at about 9 seconds the first time, but then would start to load in about 5 seconds.</p>
<p>This is completely non-scientific but it shows that it can help out even if the main hard disk is already rather fast &#8212; in this case, it&#8217;s fully solid state so it&#8217;s a similar form.  I&#8217;m guessing that the responsiveness boost here comes from the fact that Vista can read from both at once without saturating the higher levels of bus bandwidth.  </p>
<p>It sits flush in the machine, so there is no reason for me to not have it in (unless I find it hurts the battery life by continually moving the cache around &#8212; it used 50% processor for over a minute to load up the cache right after insert).  A faster one might do even more good, too.  It seems to only write at about 2-3MB/sec and doesn&#8217;t appear to read much faster than that.</p>
<p>Just some more data &#8212; &#8220;jeff&#8221; above had asked about Memory Sticks and this confirms they help just like everything else.</p>
<p>-Shane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-23084</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-23084</guid>
		<description>Long, Everything you said was true but at the bottom you wrote that you are unhappy with the way this was marketed and perceived by the public. I just wanted to clarify that you were talking about the way consumers are spreading the word and not Microsoft. I only say this because I have read all over the place MS saying exactly what you said and even less expectations. They say that the real performance is with 512mb of ram and that with 1gb and especially 2gb you would rarely see a difference.

On another note, I&#039;m thinking that if SuperFetch works properly, that is where us with large ram sizes will benifit. That being said I still have 2gb of ram with a 2gb flash card out the back of my pc :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long, Everything you said was true but at the bottom you wrote that you are unhappy with the way this was marketed and perceived by the public. I just wanted to clarify that you were talking about the way consumers are spreading the word and not Microsoft. I only say this because I have read all over the place MS saying exactly what you said and even less expectations. They say that the real performance is with 512mb of ram and that with 1gb and especially 2gb you would rarely see a difference.</p>
<p>On another note, I&#8217;m thinking that if SuperFetch works properly, that is where us with large ram sizes will benifit. That being said I still have 2gb of ram with a 2gb flash card out the back of my pc <img src='http://www.istartedsomething.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jedi</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-22839</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-22839</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are clearly some bugs with ReadyBoost in the RTM version of Windows Vista. For example, sometimes after resume from standby, ReadyBoost fails to initialize at all even though the setting is enabled.&quot;

I&#039;ve found this too.  Sometimes right after resuming from suspend Vista will pop up a box with &#039;unrecognized USB device&#039;, and my ReadyBoost drive will not be available.  It&#039;s frustrating but I&#039;m glad someone else has confirmed that this is a bug.  However it kind of spoils the idea if you have to unplug and replug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are clearly some bugs with ReadyBoost in the RTM version of Windows Vista. For example, sometimes after resume from standby, ReadyBoost fails to initialize at all even though the setting is enabled.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found this too.  Sometimes right after resuming from suspend Vista will pop up a box with &#8216;unrecognized USB device&#8217;, and my ReadyBoost drive will not be available.  It&#8217;s frustrating but I&#8217;m glad someone else has confirmed that this is a bug.  However it kind of spoils the idea if you have to unplug and replug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shan hu wang</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-22565</link>
		<dc:creator>shan hu wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-22565</guid>
		<description>Thank you.This is a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.This is a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Zheng</title>
		<link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-22220</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Zheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070307/readyboost-works/#comment-22220</guid>
		<description>@Tomer Chachamu: Excellent comparison!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tomer Chachamu: Excellent comparison!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
