Comments on: Windows Vista: fitted and nearly-finished

By: BackgroundMedia

BackgroundMedia — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:55:09 +0000

Really, really nice!!!

By: Ian

Ian — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:58:51 +0000

Thank you for these.
It’s so cool~

By: Greg

Greg — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:39:23 +0000

what software was used to take the icons from the .dll’s or .exe’s ?

By: Y Hack

Y Hack — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:53:45 +0000

thanks for these cool free images.

By: med

med — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:05 +0000

thanks for this icons

By: med

med — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:56:09 +0000

thank u for this ….

By: 이상하

이상하 — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:26:44 +0000

어떻게 가는거에요?

By: Ramtin

Ramtin — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:13:24 +0000

thanks for icons….

By: BGG001

BGG001 — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:55:31 +0000

I personally don’t care about Icons, but typically its good eye candy for sales. If people see a nice looking interface and good icons to polish it off, it’ll improve the chance of a sale. Honestly, after a day or two of using the new icons, it barely takes any time to realize “Oh, this is Photoshop” or word or whatever program it may be.

By: dave

dave — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:44:30 +0000

Oh, so YOU’RE the guy to blame then. Ever think about what purpose icons actually serve? They aren’t there to show the graphics capabilities of the latest operating system nor the skills and sensibilities of their designer. It is a GOOD thing to use the exact same icons year after year. Why? Because it allows people to find what they are looking for INSTANTLY, without having to even think about it. Now, with Vista, we need to relearn all that. Notice how it takes a second or so longer to recognize all these updated versions of old familiar icons. Sure, it’s not shaving days out of our lives, but it is a tangible and completely unnecessary nuisance. I don’t care if the icon for Word or Control Panel hasn’t changed since ‘95. I just want to find what I need and get my work done.