Comments on: Spot the difference: Apple photoshops Vista logo

By: Shan

Shan — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:41 +0000

Apple = Jealous guys, and mad at all Yeah Apple, we da best

By: Tom

Tom — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:32:05 +0000

WINDOWS > APPLE

Just move on Steve, move on.

By: Dojan5

Dojan5 — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:35:26 +0000

I got to say that Apples Windows logo looks SO much better than the actual Windows Logo.
And, sure, people say that Windows have copied Apple.
Yeah, for some people thats true, for some other it is not true.
In a world where humans have existed for a couple of thousand years, it is actually hard to invent something new.
Honestly, Macintosh OS X Leopard have copied other functions, like Spaces, having multiple desktops are old school for people using Linux.
If i should go to the bottom you could say that Windows Linux Unix and all Operating Systems have copied Apple Macintosh, since Apple was the company that created the Computer Desktop, and the mouse.
Without them i am pretty sure we would still have command line.
So all you Windows Fanboys out there, Windows is not entirely genuine, Microsoft did not invent everything in their os. Same goes for Linux fans and Mac fans.
People will always copy, improve (or not) and thats the way things are.

By: Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:28:00 +0000

Apple > Windows

By: SkippyThorson

SkippyThorson — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:12:32 +0000

It’s about as necessary as realism in Super Mario. Some people don’t get it.

You can dress up a bag of garbage all you want, even slap some amazing new designs on it, but it’s still a bag of garbage underneath. The pretty little animations don’t do anything but eat up Ram, as you said. Nothing more. They don’t provide me with any better user experience.

3D was and is OS X in many ways you obviously don’t know of. For one instance, when Vista’s screen rotates as a cube when you switch users, let me know. Then, there’s Time Machine. Just today I got an app that gives me 3D Spaces in Tiger.

There’s more subtle animation in Leopard than Vista can even boast. Not to mention, they aren’t visually completely different. Take a spin through OS X, and tell me how many things seem familiar to you. After all, Vista is just a bad misrepresentation of quality.

By: Sonny

Sonny — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:49:32 +0000

I don’t know why you are comparing two OS that cannot not be really comparable.
Macs are high-end units that uses a remarkably 2D with some 3D effects while MS Vista is all throughout is 3D, with all the transparencies on every window you open, in the taskbar, start menu, and almost everything. Vista Flip3D, Flip, Eye Candy icons. Everything eats up RAM and you should know that. While OS X, nahh, is still similar to the 2D Windows Classic Interface. Get the point?
How would you compare a fully animated OS to a noticeably boring, simple OS?

By: SkippyThorson

SkippyThorson — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:41:58 +0000

A year and a half old and still going. Holy hell.
Steve-O took Billy’s crappy logo and illuminated it so the photoshopped image could make sense in a place during a presentation. He said “Underneath, it’s still Windows”, and as he said that, the blue bubble around the logo disappeared. It’s a layered photo he used in a Keynote speech.
Frigtards.
Boom. Mystery gone.

By: anon

anon — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:01:15 +0000

If you run vista.. you would notice that the start button/windows button is that logo which you so claim to be ‘forged’

By: Kieran G

Kieran G — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:27:55 +0000

i personally think apple is better than windows. Windows is slow and dull and is the reason i brought a mac which i find actually works better.

By: mrmckeb

mrmckeb — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:40:27 +0000

@ Greg Formager
That doesn’t even makes sense.